MVME162-532系統(tǒng)模塊卡件
然而，明確禁止分銷或銷售由博士和博士開(kāi)發(fā)的相關(guān)材料以及先前版本的利潤(rùn)易貨或貿(mào)易。用戶資格可由其醫(yī)療或康復(fù)專業(yè)人員和其他熟悉個(gè)人的指定觀察員完成?；加袊?yán)重認(rèn)知障礙的人不應(yīng)接受。在進(jìn)行評(píng)級(jí)之前，專業(yè)人員應(yīng)審查本手冊(cè)中提供的評(píng)級(jí)指南。擁有或其的人員在進(jìn)行評(píng)級(jí)之前，應(yīng)讓一名熟悉的專業(yè)人員與他們一起審查評(píng)級(jí)指南，并讓他們回答在完成盤(pán)點(diǎn)過(guò)程中可能出現(xiàn)的任何問(wèn)題。目前，我們建議擁有的人和他們的作為員工完成相同版本的。在臨床實(shí)踐中，患者及其的工作人員的獨(dú)立評(píng)分之間的比較可以提供關(guān)于這些評(píng)分者群體的不同觀點(diǎn)的信息。檢查和討論這些不同的觀點(diǎn)對(duì)于有效的康復(fù)計(jì)劃以及揭示更微妙的問(wèn)題領(lǐng)域通常至關(guān)重要。的評(píng)分和解釋需要專業(yè)培訓(xùn)和經(jīng)驗(yàn)。理想情況下，使用進(jìn)行臨床評(píng)估的臨床團(tuán)隊(duì)將獲得在測(cè)試和測(cè)量方面受過(guò)高級(jí)培訓(xùn)的專業(yè)人員。當(dāng)用于項(xiàng)目評(píng)估或研究時(shí)，此類熟練的心理測(cè)量師也應(yīng)參與其中。臨床環(huán)境中的專業(yè)人員對(duì)的解釋除了測(cè)試和測(cè)量的基本知識(shí)外，還需要對(duì)儀器和的具體經(jīng)驗(yàn)。管理和評(píng)分填寫(xiě)如果要由多名評(píng)分員填寫(xiě)清單，則及其的工作人員應(yīng)使用的單獨(dú)表格。工作人員可以使用一種表格以協(xié)商一致的方式完成清單。工作人員的協(xié)商一致評(píng)估結(jié)果是最可靠和準(zhǔn)確的評(píng)估。如果只有一名員工完成了，建議咨詢已經(jīng)評(píng)估或治療過(guò)患者的其他員工。要完成，首先在第一頁(yè)的頂部放置人員的姓名。還提供了一個(gè)診所號(hào)碼或其他號(hào)碼的空間，該號(hào)碼將患者與設(shè)施特定的其他信息聯(lián)系起來(lái)。列出庫(kù)存日期，并圈出或填寫(xiě)完成庫(kù)存的人員。然后給每個(gè)項(xiàng)目打分。表格中提供了幫助進(jìn)行單項(xiàng)評(píng)分的簡(jiǎn)要說(shuō)明。單項(xiàng)評(píng)分指南的前項(xiàng)表示后的當(dāng)前狀態(tài)或結(jié)果。分析表明，這個(gè)項(xiàng)目所代表的單一維度具有內(nèi)部一致性。其他分析表明，這一主要維度包括代表能力活動(dòng)和社會(huì)參與的三個(gè)區(qū)域。在三個(gè)分量表指數(shù)中確定了對(duì)每個(gè)區(qū)域有貢獻(xiàn)的項(xiàng)目。主要用于代表的后遺癥。的前項(xiàng)應(yīng)反映被評(píng)定者的當(dāng)前狀態(tài)，無(wú)論是否有腦損傷以外的情況導(dǎo)致能力活動(dòng)或參與受限。這是因?yàn)?，如果不是不可能的話，要確定哪些因素腦損傷其他因素是導(dǎo)致目前狀況的原因，通常是非常困難的。如果存在其他預(yù)先存在或共存的條件，導(dǎo)致前項(xiàng)中的限制，這些條件將在清單第項(xiàng)中確定。如果需要藥物治療以實(shí)現(xiàn)正?；蚪咏５墓δ?，則通過(guò)將該項(xiàng)目評(píng)級(jí)為級(jí)來(lái)反映。例如，如果使用興奮劑藥物消除了注意力問(wèn)題，則該人將在第項(xiàng)中被評(píng)為。
However, the distribution or sale of related materials developed by Dr. and Dr. and profit barter or trading of previous versions are expressly prohibited. The user qualification can be completed by its medical or rehabilitation professionals and other designated observers who are familiar with individuals. People with severe cognitive impairment should not accept it. Before rating, professionals should review the rating guidelines provided in this manual. Before rating, the owner or his/her staff should have a familiar professional review the rating guide with them and ask them to answer any questions that may arise during the completion of the inventory. At present, we recommend that the owner and their employees complete the same version of. In clinical practice, the comparison between the independent scores of patients and their staff can provide information about the different views of these rater groups. Examining and discussing these different perspectives is often critical for effective rehabilitation planning and for uncovering more subtle problem areas. Professional training and experience are required to score and explain. Ideally, clinical teams that use clinical assessments will have highly trained professionals in testing and measurement. When used for project evaluation or research, such skilled psychometrists should also be involved. In addition to the basic knowledge of testing and measurement, professionals in the clinical environment also need specific experience of instruments and. Management and Scoring Filling In If the list is to be filled in by more than one rater, a separate form should be used by his or her staff. Staff can use a form to complete the list by consensus. The consensus assessment result of the staff is the most reliable and accurate assessment. If only one employee has completed it, it is recommended to consult with other employees who have evaluated or treated patients. To complete, first place the name of the person at the top of the first page. It also provides a space for a clinic number or other number that connects the patient to other facility specific information. List the inventory date and circle or fill in the person who completed the inventory. Then grade each item. The table provides a brief description to help with individual scoring. The first item of the individual scoring guide represents the current status or result. The analysis shows that the single dimension represented by this project has internal consistency. Other analysis shows that this main dimension includes three regions representing capacity activities and social participation. Projects contributing to each region are identified in the three subscale indexes. It is mainly used to represent the sequela. The preceding item of should reflect the current status of the assessed person, regardless of whether there is any situation other than brain injury that leads to limited ability activities or participation. This is because, if it is not impossible, it is usually very difficult to determine which factors of brain injury and other factors are the causes of the current situation. If there are other pre-existing or coexisting conditions that lead to the restrictions in the preceding item, these conditions will be determined in item of the list. If drug treatment is required to achieve normal or near normal functions, it shall be reflected by rating the item as Grade. For example, if the use of stimulant drugs eliminates attention problems, the person will be rated in item.
